You may occasionally see Ag Assistant™ flag a field for high CV (Coefficient of Variation). CV measures how uniform stand counts are across a field. Higher CV values indicate greater variability, which can impact yield potential and management decisions.
Why should a grower care about a high CV?
A high CV is not just a statistical flag – it signals real crop stress that can translate into bushels lost at harvest.
In agronomic terms, CV quantifies how consistently plants emerged, established, and developed. High variability leads to uneven canopy closure, intensified plant-to-plant competition, and reduced light interception efficiency – all of which directly suppress grain fill and final yield.
CV measures the distances between consecutive plants in a row (e.g., 6", 7.5", 5", 8", 6.5"...), then calculates the standard deviation of those distances and divides by their mean. The result tells you how erratic the planter or the seed germination quality was. A low CV could mean seeds landed at very consistent intervals, a high CV could mean you have a mix of doubles, skips, and irregular gaps.
How is CV Calculated?
CV (%) = (Standard Deviation ÷ Mean) × 100
Example:
10 stand counts — Mean = 32.6 plants, SD = 3.0
CV = (3.0 ÷ 32.6) × 100 = 9.2% (Excellent)
CV Value Ranges
CV Range (%)
| Variability Level (Uniformity) | What It Means | Recommended Action |
< 10% | Excellent | Highly uniform stand; minimal variability | No intervention needed |
10% – 15% | Good | Acceptable uniformity for most production systems | Monitor; minor adjustments may help |
15% – 20% | Moderate | Noticeable variability; yield drag likely | Investigate root cause; review inputs |
20% – 30% | High | Significant variability; meaningful yield loss probable | Priority review of planting & soil management |
> 30% | Very High | Severe variability; major agronomic problem | Immediate investigation and corrective action |
Implications of High CV
Yield Impact
- Uneven canopy causes taller plants to shade smaller neighbors, reducing yield potential of weaker plants and increasing ear barrenness.
Agronomic Efficiency Loss
- Fertilizer applied to gaps or weak-stand zones goes underutilized, raising cost per bushel and risking nutrient loss to leaching.
Management Timing Challenges
- Growth-stage spread across the field makes herbicide, fungicide, and insecticide timing suboptimal for a portion of the crop.
Water Use Inefficiency
- Patchy stands create uneven water demand, reducing irrigation efficiency and increasing drought-stress risk in thinner areas of the field.